How many thousands of dollars have they spent on the new logo?

When you consider the fact that senior management at Metrolink cold care less about safety (Board Chairman Keith Millhouse has refused to open e-mails regarding a dangerous employee) perhaps they should be more concerned about safety than what the company logo looks like.
(If members of the media want written proof of this, please contact the webmaster at: bob@metrolinkrider.com, the e-mails were sent through a tracking server.)
What is more important? How the train looks? Or how safe the train is. It seems the management is more concerned about how the train logo looks than how safe the train is.
Tell that to the 25 people who died in the recent Metrolink crash.
Thoughts?
